

Opponents of high-volume hydraulic fracturing in New York state are calling on Governor Andrew Cuomo to withdraw a draft environmental impact statement on the process.
Fracking foes have sent a letter to the governor urging him to direct the state Department of Health to conduct an open and transparent public health impact study.
Walter Hang, president of Ithaca-based Toxics Targeting, says the state’s draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement on fracking is outdated and “lacks any current information.”
Hang contends the Department of Environmental Conservation report is “obviously unsuitable to support any decision” by Cuomo to allow fracking in the Marcellus Shale of New York.
Hang says the existing impact statement would inadequately protect New Yorkers from potential hazards related to fracking operations.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 5.18 MB |

Ithaca, N.Y. — The report that could help determine the future of Marcellus Shale fracking is hopelessly outdated and should be discarded, an environmental advocacy group said in a statement Monday.
In 2009, New York produced a draft “supplemental environmental impact statement” to assess how fracking in the Marcellus Shale formation would affect the region. The idea of the study was to adopt new environmental and health safeguards before permitting the controversial drilling practice.

“It lacks any current information,” a petition being circulated by Toxics Targeting says of the environmental impact statement. (The petition demands that Cuomo withdraw the current impact statement and order the state’s Department of Health to start a new one.)
“As a result, it fails to assess hundreds of recent investigations, studies and reports that have significantly expanded the scientific understanding of shale fracking’s pollution impacts.”
Fracking in N.Y. has been in limbo since a statewide moratorium was placed on it in 2008. Cuomo has not announced if he supports fracking the Marcellus Shale or not, saying instead that he wants to learn more about its impact.
The indecision hasn’t just caught Cuomo flack from the left. In January, the New York Post quoted the head of the American Petroleum Institute as criticizing Cuomo for “hiding ‘for far too long’ behind the ‘excuse’ of conducting a health study on the safety of fracking.”
“I think it’s unfortunate because it hurts his state. It hurts economic development in his state,” said the API president, Jack Gerard.
But the de facto prohibition of fracking, so frustrating for those in the industry, has been seen as an important victory for N.Y.’s environmental activists.
“The bottom line is that if New York’s shale fracking moratorium can be extended for another few years, our state could be the first in USA mining history to phase out fossil fuel extraction and the contamination hazards caused by that inadequately regulated industry,” a statement from Toxics Targeting says.
Here’s some of the text of the Toxics Targeting letter to Gov. Cuomo:
“We, the undersigned, write respectfully to request that you withdraw the Marcellus Shale Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS) because it is nearly five years old, lacks any current information whatsoever and would inadequately protect New York from fracking hazards.
In 2008, the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) decided not to permit shale fracking until a Final SGEIS was adopted to safeguard public health and the environment. That de facto moratorium has prevented even one shale gas production well from ever being fracked in our state.
The original Draft SGEIS was proposed in 2009 and is based on a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) adopted nearly 22 years ago. The Draft SGEIS is based on a scoping proceeding undertaken six years ago. A Revised Draft SGEIS was released nearly three years ago and has never been updated.
Given the long delay in adopting the Draft SGEIS, it lacks any current information. As a result, it fails to assess hundreds of recent investigations, studies and reports that have significantly expanded the scientific understanding of shale fracking’s pollution impacts.
Most importantly, the “health impact analysis” in the Draft SGEIS reflects information that is nearly five years old. That is ancient by scientific investigation standards.
Given these shortcomings, it would be inappropriate to make a decision to permit shale fracking in New York based on a Draft SGEIS that is too old and outdated to fulfill that purpose.
That is why we respectfully request that you:
a) Withdraw the Draft SGEIS;
b) Halt your State Department of Health (DOH) “review” of the dated “health impact analysis” in the Draft SGEIS;
c) Instruct your DOH to undertake a comprehensive shale fracking “Public Health Impact Study” openly and transparently using all available current data;
d) Require DOH and DEC to utilize the findings of the “Public Health Impact Study” to propose and adopt a new Generic Environmental Impact Statement. That is precisely what the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency recommended in 2009.
See: http://www.toxicstargeting.com/sites/default/files/Marcellus_dSGEIS_Comment_Letter_plus_Enclosure_0.pdfAgainst that background, New York has an unprecedented opportunity to eliminate the fossil fuel extraction hazards that have plagued our state for nearly 200 years. Only one natural gas well was drilled and “completed” for production in New York during all of 2013, the most recent year for which DEC permitting information is publicly available.

Hundreds of people have signed onto a letter asking Governor Cuomo to withdraw the documents originally designed to help establish guidelines for fracking.
Former Binghamton Mayor Matt Ryan, Toxics Targeting President Walter Hang and others say the 5-year-old draft is outdated and lacks a comprehensive health study. Hang says an ongoing fracking health review by the state must be halted and a transparent public health impact study should be done.
Walter Hang says, "The Governor has promised that his final decision, whether to permit shale fracking in New York, would be based on good science. So, that means that it has to based on our current understanding of what the pollution hazards are. There are literally hundreds of studies, government investigations that are not addressed in this document."
Hang's letter to the Governor is on his website, ToxicsTargeting.com. The organization Unshackle Upstate and the Greater Binghamton Chamber of Commerce issued a statement this afternoon saying that Southern Tier residents are tired of gas development being a political issue and that the state should allow fracking to proceed.

Binghamton, NY (WBNG Binghamton) An environmental group is calling on New York to start over on the SGEIS, a DEC document outlining permit regulations for natural gas drilling using hydraulic fracturing.
It has yet to be finalized.
This call comes a week after a court ruling gave power to local governments to decide whether to allow fracking in their own areas should New York approve the regulations.
"The governor has just got to kill this proceeding and start over again," said Walter Hang, president of Toxics Targeting, an environmental database firm in Ithaca.
Hang said the data Governor Andrew Cuomo is using to determine the safety of fracking is just too old.
"It's simply not suitable to base arguably the most important public policy decision on the environment in a generation," said Hang.
In a letter being drafted to the governor, Toxics Targeting calls for the 5-year-old fracking data to be thrown out saying the state needs to start their research over.
"It ignores literally hundreds of recent studies and government investigations," said Hang.
The group also wants a public health study to be done.
"It's never all been put together to see what the real public health impacts of this industry are," said Matt Ryan, former mayor of Binghamton.
The letter being sent to the governor can be found here and their collecting signatures from New Yorkers.
In less than 24 hours, they received more than 800 signatures.
"We would just be horrified if that would be considered old science," said Benjamin Perkus who signed the letter on behalf of New York Residents Against Drilling. "The health impact review that is currently underway is totally inadequate. It's antiquated. It's using old data."
Governor Cuomo hasn't made a public decision on fracking just yet.
Hang said he thinks the Governor will approve it, but the dated data is holding him back.
If the governor doesn't make a decision?
Hang said it'll hurt the governor in his quest for reelection.

BINGHAMTON, N.Y. -- An anti-fracking coalition says a lot has happened in the past five years. With recent studies, government investigations, and new technology and information available, they are demanding the governor keep up with the times. They are asking him to withdraw the current DEC Draft Environmental Impact Statement on hydraulic fracturing.
"It's not current. It lacks literally hundreds of new studies and that’s why it has got to be stopped," said Walter Hang, Toxics Targeting president.
Hang wants Gov. Andrew Cuomo to take new action. He calls the current draft, "ancient" and not suitable for the governor to make a final decision on fracking.
"He hasn’t been able to approve shale fracking because he hasn’t been able to complete the Department of Health Review conducted totally in secret and he hasn’t been able to adopt comprehensive public health and environment safeguards pursuant to a final SGEIS," Hang said.
Former Binghamton Mayor Matt Ryan says an updated statement is necessary to completely understand the potential hazards.
“It’s never been all put together to see what the real public health impacts of this industry are,” Ryan said.
Supporters of natural gas drilling say if the draft has been successful thus far, it should not be withdrawn.
"There has been fracking in New York state for 60 years, they have not had incidents. The regulations as they stand were very effective and efficient. There is no need to update the regulations," said Gary VanDriesen, 7911 Landowners Coalition leader.
The Department of Health Commissioner recently resigned before completing his review of the health impact analysis, an evaluation that must be completed before a final impact statement is adopted.
The coalition's letter to the governor currently has more than 875 signatures.
To view the draft: head to this link
To view the letter: head to this link